The Juxtaposition of Relatability and Defamiliarization


Though unique in many respects, The Mezzanine is defined by two common literary devices – relatability and defamiliarization. The omnipresence of these two conventions transforms an otherwise incoherent document of ramblings into a work of thought evoking art. In isolation, these two conventions seem ordinary – both are implemented to retain reader attention and facilitate plot pacing. However, the simultaneous use of these two devices seems objectively counterproductive. In theory, the concepts of relatability and defamiliarization, being inherently opposed, should detract from each other rather than complementing one another. On one hand, relatability immerses readers into a work of literature by strengthening their bond with the relatable character. In the case of The Mezzanine, relatability is inseparable from humor – often accompanying Howie’s accounts of unremarkable actions that all readers have experienced. Conversely, defamiliarization deals with abstraction, creating engagement by forcing readers to consider a subject on a deeper, conceptual level. Howie’s pervasive defamiliarization often offsets his moments of relatability, portraying him as a strange specimen rather than a relatable everyman.


Of all the thoughts streaming through Howie’s consciousness, there is perhaps none more relatable than his system for retesting personal preferences. Coming off a tangent about milk delivery services, Howie says “I drink milk very rarely now; in fact, the half-pint carton I bought at Papa Gino’s to go with the cookie was one of the very last times: it was a sort of test to see whether I could drink it with the old pleasure. (You have to spot-check your likes and dislikes every so often in this way to see whether your reactions have been altered, I think)” (Baker 42). Comments such as these establish rapport with readers, sparking the epiphany that they too have been in Howie’s situation, performing the exact same actions. Simultaneously, this moment of relatability supports the larger theme of the novel – appreciation for subconscious everyday occurrences that are traditionally either written off as mundane or disregarded entirely. 


The second literary device, defamiliarization, takes many forms throughout the novel. Sometimes it manifests as one of Howie’s behaviors that is markedly not relatable, such as his methodology for peeing at public urinals. More commonly, it takes the form of an extensively detailed observation of an ordinary object, often riddled with metaphor. For example, while contemplating the functionality of a record, Howie mentally explores the grooves of the record by weaving an analogy between ice skating and record playing. Although the connection between the two is logical, it is likely not something that the average person dedicates though to. Therefore, the metaphor evokes profound consideration of two formerly familiar objects, thus promoting the overall objective of the story – encouraging readers to revel in common life experiences and observations.


Although the devices of relatability and defamiliarization cast Howie in opposing lights, both ultimately solidify The Mezzanine’s broader theme of appreciation for everyday life. The two conventions both draw attention to elements of everyday proceeding which are typically subliminal. Indiscriminate usage of the rivaling literary devices conveys the primary theme of the novel at the expense of consistency for Howie’s character.


Comments

  1. My primary thought after reading this is more of a question; at which points and to what extent was Howies character truly compromised due to the contrasting literary devices? When initially reading the book I wasn't struck with these thoughts but at a point of reflection this way of writing allotted for a greater development of Howie in my eyes. Finding Howie relatable is something that everyone likely falls too but having experiences that don't remind one of their own wasn't too uncommon.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The use of relatability and defamiliarization, two seemingly contradictory literary devices, creates a unique reading experience. The relatability of Howie's experiences makes me recognize my own habits and thoughts in his. And at the same time, the defamiliarization of these same experiences made me reconsider what I take for granted. Sometimes, Howie leads me into his internal world where I feel strangely connected to experiences I personally haven't had. The blend of the ordinary and his infatuation creates a contrast in the story that makes it particularly enriching to explore.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really like the observation that a relatable narrative and a defamiliarizing narrative would not necessarily be compatible with one another--as "relatable" implies something like "familiar" or "recognizable," while "defamiliarizing" seems to imply the opposite. There maybe is a way to think about how the novel merges these tendencies together, though. As usual when writing about this book, I'm not totally sure how to put this--but I do often get the sensation--while reading this book, when Howie pulls a "clean-background trick" and gets me noticing details I'd never noticed before--that I HAVE had these perceptions and impressions before, even if I haven't.

    Once example I often cite in class is Howie's description of the ways we can fill an ice-cube tray--either holding it tilted slightly and letting the water spread, or moving it back and forth under the stream, "feeling as if you were playing the harmonica." Prior to reading this sentence, the analogy between the look and design of an ice-cube tray and the mouth-side of a harmonica had never crossed my mind before, but Baker pulls off a neat trick with the use of second person: he writes as if he PRESUMES that "we all" have had this same experience, and he magically places US in his own very subjective memory, insisting that WE ALL have this fleeting harmonica-playing sensation when filling an ice-cube tray. Suddenly this unfamiliar and surprising analogy seems perfectly logical, maybe even a repressed memory I've had but lost. Howie's narrative is punctuated with unique, distinctive, original, and highly subjective observations, but somehow he makes it feel like we've already had these thoughts and perceptions before.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Judging Sethe

Jake's Character Development